• australianflyingcorps.org
  • archives 2002
  • archives 1999
  • tag cloud
  • login
  • register
  • write
  • Australian Flying Corps.
    A history of Australian aviation from 1914-1919 and much more.

    The dopings used by the British in WWI were commonly known as PC10, PC12 and CDL where the latter stands for clear doped linen. These were applied over the linen cloth of the wings, fuselage and tail of the aircraft

    The Australian Flying Corps aircraft were all from British stock and factories. Consequently the dopings for the AFC aircraft were the same as the RAF, RFC and RNAS. This was commonly PC10 upper and CDL under the wings and elevators. PC 10 was a bit of a slippery colour which changed from a brown to green shade as the war progressed. Additionally as it was subject to weathering it browned in colour. Another issue is that quality control was not the same in 1916 as it is in modern factories that have the benefits of digital technology and statistical process control. PC10 was very definitely a bucket chemistry proposition.

    Bristol Fighter of No.1 Sqn AFC in the protective covering of PC10 doping. The engine cowl is painted in battleship grey.

    For one hundred gallons of PC10 the recipe is :

    260 pounds nitro Cellulose syrup

    74 pounds of pigments in the following proportions:

      40 pounds yellow ochre
      30 pounds umber
      2 pounds 8 ounces Red Ochre
      1 pound 8 ounces Chinese Blue

    Which was then added to:

    20 gallons Acetone or Methyl ethyl ketone
    15 gallons Amyl Acetate
    15 Gallons benzol
    15 gallons Methylated spirit

    As can be seen from the 'recipe' it is more like baking a cake than the precision of modern factories which produce identical products 24.7 with minimal variation.

    The AFC squadrons in France were very uniform in their dopings, largely being with PC10 upper and CDL lower with either polished or grey cowls. The training squadrons in England had higher variation including red, white and black-and-white chequered aircraft.

    The anomaly is No.1 Squadron in the Middle East. They seemed to go through phases where aircraft were relatively uniform in dopings but outside of the standards of the AFC/RFC squadrons in France.

    For instance their BE2s and BE12s appear to be uniformly CDL all over until they went through a period where PC12 - PC10s reddish cousin - started appearing on on their upper surfaces. The Martinsydes in No.1 squadron went through a similar phase. One aircraft it seems was CDL lower, PC12 upper and a PC10 tailfin - complete with white serial.

    Martinsyde G100 of No.1 Sqn AFC with PC12 upper surfaces and PC10 tail. Profile is taken from a photo in One Airman's War

    The Martinsydes then appear to have been standardised on all-over CDL before the Bristol Fighter's made their appearance in the squadron. Initially the Bristol Fighters had a mix of white and PC10 markings.

    Bristol Fighter A7194 of No.1 Sqn AFC with white and PC10 upper surfaces.

    Like the Martinsyde, the Bristol Fighters became standardised in the PC10 uppers and CDL lowers, though one aircraft was recorded as being yellow all over, though there has been no photographic evidence of the 'yellow peril' Biff. It may have been ochre, CDL or erroneously reported as yellow.

    More reading: AFC Tags, 1 Sqn AFC, PC10, PC12

    Comments

  • ajcooper . # .
    PC10 confusion: Yes, the quality control issues point to considerable variation in hue, even aside from such effects as rotary-engined aeroplanes\' flung castor oil, & weathering. I had been convinced by J.M. Bruce it was a brown shade (produced by ochre & black), but recent articles have asserted it was green. Peter Jackson\'s people have chosen a nasty pea green for their Camel replica in NZ, pointing to the problem.
    It\'s like RAF WW2 colours - the variations in interpretation of RAF \'dark green\' & \'dark earth\' are bewildering. If the more scientific WW2 & post WW2 era can\'t produce uniformity of interpretation, then what hope is there for WW1?
    I\'m sticking with brown until disproved by overwhelming evidence.
    Recent Comments
    Thanks Cam. (I'll forward your site on to Alex - ... Phil (article)
    Williams: Could you please define Williams\' beliefs in this context? ... (article)
    4 Sqn \'schism\': Please explain the schism you refer to. ... (article)
    RAAF aircover for the RAN\'s frigates?: Agreed re the desirability ... (article)
    Camel performance overstated?: The Camel\'s quoted performance figures are about ... (article)
    RE8 not so bad as it\'s cracked up to be?: ... (article)
    PC10 confusion: Yes, the quality control issues point to considerable ... (article)
    not yellow: \'Yellow\' is a term used very loosely. Surely ... (article)
    it\'s a shadow: In the top photo, of aircraft \'351, ... (article)
    Snipe performance not a matter of opinion: It doesn\'t matter ... (article)
    Richtofen\'s \'trick\': That story is totally apocryphal. Richtofen crept up ... (article)
    Milne Bay, Kokoda, & Guadalcanal: Obviously Milne Bay & Kokoda ... (article)
    Superior German aerofoils: The funny thing is that the Germans ... (article)
    German aircraft inferiority: Interesting. I\'ve always found the low quoted ... (article)
    Aces scoring: No surprise there. Yeats\' \'Winged victory\' is very ... (article)
    This article: also appears at hyperscale: 6AFC/RAAF and Kangaroo Roundel ... (article)
    When I did the original profile: seven years ago or ... (article)
    It is the AWM\'s retarded deep linking policy: that made ... (article)
    Apology: The above links have been hijacked by the worst ... (article)
    Photographic evidence: I don\'t suppose you can point us in ... (article)